Walt Disney had a long working interest in writer/mathematician Lewis
Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking
Glass, at least superficially. In the 1920’s he and his brother Roy had
found their footing as film makers by making a series of shorts called
the Alice Comedies that featured a little girl named Alice who would
interact with animated characters and
environments, like a primitive Who Framed Roger Rabbit. After the
success of Mickey Mouse and the Silly Symphony cartoons, and apparently
before the preliminary work on Snow White, he had even considered making
a feature length film in accordance with this very same idea but
probably abandoned the idea when Paramount Pictures produced a live
action Alice in Wonderland in 1933 (a bomb).
According to
accounts gathered by Disney historian Neal Gabler, Walt Disney was actually reticent to
make a movie based directly on Carroll’s novels but that after Snow
White he had been so successful that there were those among the literati
that were pressing him (at his polo matches) to make such a film. It
was assumed that the literary weight of Carroll’s novels, popular among
intellectuals at the time, coupled with Disney’s artistic prowess, also
popular among intellectuals at the time, would yield a sure fire
masterpiece of some importance. Whatever his personal view of the matter
Disney had gone ahead and acquired the rights to the film by 1938,
apparently convinced that so popular a “story” ought to be at least
attempted. As with many intended Disney projects at the time, the onset
of World War II would put the movie on hold for years.
Every
exposure I’ve had to the Lewis Carroll’s novels indicates to me that
they are essentially grotesque thought experiments about the philosophy
of language and logic, an extraordinarily English (and
characteristically boring) pastime if there ever was one. However, I’ve
seen nothing to indicate to me that in them resides a good story that
can be put on the screen. I think that Walt Disney must have agreed with
this sentiment and perhaps this is why the final product infamously
detracts so much from the spirit of Carroll’s original work, aiming more
for artistic expression and good humor over and against intellectual
puzzling. Indeed, Disney had often said that he never really wanted to
make the movie in the first place and of all of the animated films Disney produced in his
lifetime this was the one that he clearly hated the most. Perhaps this
was because of how poorly it performed at the box office? Or perhaps he
just never really felt much for the literary content he had to work
with. I feel his pain. But was it really as bad as Disney
claimed?
If Alice in Wonderland is about anything at all then it is
about a young girl, named Alice, who spontaneously follows a white
rabbit down a hole which leads her away from a boring history lesson in
the park, that she was ignoring, to a series of what I guess can be
called close encounters with the bizarre. There isn’t really a story at
all, which is part of the problem, but rather just a series of creative,
colorful, and often strange vignettes set in a world of nonsense called
“wonderland”. Or at least the title indicates that it is a wonderland, I
can’t recall anyone in the film saying anything about “wonderland” at
all now that I think about it.
Anyway, Alice spends the first
half of the movie just trying to find and pin down, for some reason,
the anthropomorphized white rabbit that sporadically appears throughout
the film only to keep telling her that he is too tardy to talk before he
runs away again. The encounters are actually pretty funny. She then
chases after him, again without explanation, and proceeds to do a lot of
things most people in her circumstance wouldn’t do: consuming strange
things that make her a giant, eating things that make her small,
confronting tweetle-dee and tweetle-dumb who tell her a pointless story
about oysters meant to indicate that there is no point, sitting down for
tea with crazy people, and so on. All the while she is strangely, and
quite unnaturally undisturbed as she merrily presses on saying such
banal commentary as, “most peculiar”. Only after so much frustration and
ape-shit crazy does she finally become persuaded that what she actually
wants to do is just find a way to get out of her drug induced nightmare
as soon as possible....I’m not sure if it’s really drug induced but
seriously this poor girl was eating a lot of mushrooms or something.
The main problem with this movie isn’t so much that there is no story,
there’s kind of a story if you have a character that wants to do
anything, but rather it’s that Alice is no character at all. Alice is simply, wholly, unappealing. She’s really, if anything,
and I suspect this is true of Carroll’s books, just a prop to bridge one
looney scenario to the next. A veritable pawn in a game of gee-whiz
intellectual gratification. The consequence is that you just don’t care
about her or her half-hearted commentary on “how strange it all is”. I
didn’t feel a thing for her and why should I because she doesn’t seem to
even realize she has a problem for like three quarters of the
movie....until she breaks down crying and dagnabbit that doesn’t
freaking count because it’s cheating!
While this is barely a
movie at all, it is still very interesting in some places and the
wonderland world really is spectacular to behold. I think it is visually
one of the very best Disney movies insofar as it clearly gave Disney’s
eccentric animators a neat playground to let loose and do some of the
crazy stuff you know those weirdos had been itching to try but
couldn’t. Just recall the bout of awesome that is the mad tea party
scene and the incredibly memorable music that accompanies it to see what
I mean. Indeed the music in this movie is also very good now that I
mention it. Further, many of the non-Alice characters and situations are
fun and just as wildly imaginative.
And then it just sort of
all ends. Like that. It’s all just a dream and everyone can go on living
their lives as if it never happened. I really like it.
We give it
3.6 white rabbits out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment