Based in a novel from 1956 of the same name, 101 Dalmatians is a
man-dog love story with some cool little touches that make for a very
fun and original movie. The story presents the parallel perspectives of
both the dogs and their owners, only that from the dog’s point of view
it is the dogs that own the people rather than the other way around.
Dogs are given another leg up (get it?)
in that they are aware of both what other dogs and humans are saying
while the humans are forced to make guesses like an episode of Lassie. I
guess you can say that the dogs of 101 Dalmatians are
super-anthropomorphized. I normally don’t care much for
anthropomorphized animals but this movie has enough charm and good
intentions that I let it slide.
Roger and Pongo, a human and a
male dalmatian respectively, are a couple of bored bachelors living
together in London until a not-so-chance meeting in the park, staged by
Pongo, leads to a romance with a dalmatian named Perdita and her human,
named Anita. A narration moves all of this along very quickly and we see
that Anita and Roger are now married and that their dogs are having
puppies....a huge litter of fifteen to be exact. This news gets the
attention of a strange associate of Anita’s, a haggard socialite named
Cruella De Vil (get it? Cruel Devil!), who excitedly offers to buy the
entire litter. For what purpose? So that she can make a coat out of
their soft little puppy fur. Obviously the answer is no, but Cruela
won’t take no for an answer and so she resorts to dognapping which
results in a full scale animal rescue filled with charm and humor.
If the story is virtuously simple it is only bolstered by the charming
if not very well developed characters. In a movie with this many
characters that would be a hard thing to accomplish indeed. However,
Cruella is actually a particularly brilliant character in this movie.
She starts off appearing as a smiling and well “polished” friend of the
family but after she reveals her cruel intentions she is shown to be
increasingly and frenetically evil until she becomes, or reveals
herself, to be a crazed monster who will stop at nothing to get her way.
She has a huge amount of screen time and is one of the most fun and
most menacing Disney villains ever. When she finally gets her
comeuppance, and you know she does, you can practically taste the
justice dripping in your mouth....and it tastes a little like awesome.
Or is that adrenaline? Or have I been drinking coffee too late in the
afternoon again?
Animation wise, this movie is an interesting
mile stone for Disney. Sleeping beauty, released in the 50s, had been a
painful box office bomb since in it’s stylistic splendor it had cost too
much to produce the old fashioned way. Indeed, ever since the animation
strikes of 1941 and the consequent increase in production costs and the
loss of 50% of the animators, Disney had found it virtually impossible
to replicate the visual splendor of Snow White or Pinocchio. In order to
find a way to reduce the cost of animated films and increase
profitability, Ub Iwerks, the co-creator and original animator of Mickey
Mouse, pioneered a way to utilize xerox technology to drastically cut
down on the labor of hand drawn animation. 101 Dalmatians is the first
movie to ever use xerography and, in fact, probably would not have been
possible without the new technology since animating 101 individual
dalmatians by hand would have been entirely too cumbersome. Yes, there
are in fact 101 dalmatians in the movie, if you haven’t seen it. But
then I’m wasting my breath because you, who have not seen it, are still
living in a monastery high in the mountains and therefore you will not
read this either. Pray for me brother.
Xerography and the move
toward more angular lines on characters completely overhauled the Disney
animation style for the next two decades or so. You’ve probably noticed
how similar the animation and look of Disney movies from the 60s are
with those from the 70s and yet different from the 40s and 50s and it is
specifically because of this technology. The unfortunate thing is that,
while fitting for this movie, xerography is far from perfect and it
tends to leave a very unpolished look to the final product. Disney
himself wasn’t really worried anymore about making perfect animated
movies though, especially after Sleeping Beauty. His near complete
devotion from 1950 or so on was the building, maintenance and expansion
of Disneyland....and we all know how that turned out. Yeah, unfreaking
believably awesome.
So it’s a technological first that
represents a step or two back for animation. It’s got an original and
interesting take on dog movies. It’s genuinely funny and the dialogue
often very clever. It has one of the best villains who has a memorable
song played about her in the movie (the one musical scene). It won’t
blow you away but at the very same time what’s not to like? It’s one of
the most popular Disney movies ever and it deserves most of the credit
it gets.
I give it 3.8 black and white puppies
No comments:
Post a Comment